New Australian Study Predicts Mesothelioma Rates Will Not Peak Until 2014

According to a study just released the incidence of mesothelioma in that country may not peak until the year 2114. A similar study done by Dr. Nicholson from Mt Sinai once predicted the rate would peak in the Untied states this year. Those estimates probably need to be revisited. In my practice, i have seen more mesotheliomas in the last year than in my previous 25 years of practice representing people who have been stricken with this terrible disease. Fro us the cases hit home every time we get a new one as we lost our grandfather to mesothelioma. Some progress has been made with treatment but certainly not enough. The key to a fighting chance i early detection. which means that if you belive you have has significant asbestos exposure even as a wife washing asbestos laden clothing, you need to tell your doctor and insure you get regular check up

For more on the Australian Study read http://ohsonline.com/articles/2009/06/26/mesothelioma-in-australia-may-peak-in-2014.aspx

Information from the Federal Government

The  ATSDR is a branch of the federal government charged with monitoring and providing information about diseases in the United States. Please click on the link below to access the ATSDR information on mesothelioma and asbestos. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/asbestos/living_asbestos/index.html

American College of Chest Physicians Agree On What Constitues An Asbestos Related Disease

There is a raging debate now for decades in asbestos cases concerning what kinds of cancers are asbestos related. Today the American College of Chest Physicians weighed in on that debate. In an article published in the June issue of Chest the College indicated: interquartile range

Executive Summary

Outcome:

32 statements and formed the basis for this

document. These statements included agreement

on the associations between asbestos exposure

and the development of radiographic

pleural or parenchymal abnormalities, clinical

associations between exposure based on a good

environmental and occupational history and the

development of disease, diagnostic utility of

high-resolution CT scan of the chest, as well as

increased risk of bronchogenic carcinoma and

documented asbestos exposure even without

documentation of asbestos fibers in respiratory

tissue of the patient. Consensus was not attained

regarding nine statements; these statements

included questions of utility regarding

chest radiographs and high-resolution CT scan

of the chest, the relationship between asbestos

exposure and pleural plaques, and the extent of

risk for the development of lung cancer in the

face of asbestos exposure.

Consensus was reached on 23 of the

Validation:

by the authors, the ACCP Occupational

and Environmental Medicine NetWork Steering

Committee, the ACCP Health and Science

Policy Committee, and the Executive Committee

of the ACCP Board of Regents.

Consensus opinions were reviewed

Sponsors:

Board of Alberta.

The ACCP and the Workers’ Compensation

In the chart referenced in the article there is agreement on the following point:

15 In an asbestos-exposed worker without asbestosis and with lung cancer, the

recognition of asbestosis among coworkers with similar exposures is sufficient

to attribute the worker’s lung cancer to asbestos exposure

8 1 0.0037

17 Workers who have significant asbestos exposure (but who do not have asbestosis)

are at increased risk of bronchogenic carcinoma

Downloaded from

www.chestjournal.org on June 4, 2009

 

CT; IQR

Blog WebMastered by All in One Webmaster.